Court of Appeal Rules in Favour of Consumers in Landmark Ruling
In what could be a major development in the UK's consumer lending industry, judges have sided with three consumers in a recent test case against car finance providers.
The financial market is not a free-for-all industry; any wrongdoing will result in consumers being entitled to compensation. At least, that is what emerges from a recent court decision concerning the payment of commissions to car dealers arranging motor finance.
In October, the Court of Appeal ruled that commissions paid to car dealers by finance providers are unlawful unless these commissions are properly disclosed to customers and informed consent is obtained.
The ruling could have significant implications for the motor finance industry and may set a new precedent for financial transparency across multiple sectors.
Car Finance Transparency Under Scrutiny
The judges analysed three lawsuits—Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, Wrench v FirstRand Bank Ltd, and Hopcraft v Close Brothers Ltd—in which consumers argued they had been misled about the true nature of their finance agreements. The Court concluded that car dealers, acting as credit brokers, breached their fiduciary duty by failing to disclose the commissions they received from lenders for arranging these loans.
These cases centred around the fact that these commissions were either entirely undisclosed or buried deep within standard terms and conditions, making it impossible for consumers to provide informed consent. The Court’s ruling confirmed that such practices represent a conflict of interest, as dealers are incentivised to recommend loans that may not be in the best interest of their customers.
The judgment emphasised that brokers owe a fiduciary duty to their clients, meaning they must act impartially and avoid conflicts of interest. This obligation was violated when commissions were kept secret, prompting the Court to hold lenders responsible for ensuring transparency.
In one case, the relationship between the lender and the car dealer was completely hidden from the claimant. In the other two cases, the claimants were neither informed nor aware that a commission would be paid. However, the lender’s standard loan terms did include a reference indicating that a commission might be paid to the salesperson. The Court of Appeal described this situation as a “partial disclosure.”
A Step Forward, But the Journey Isn’t Over
While this ruling marks a significant step towards consumer protection, it’s important to note that it doesn’t guarantee immediate compensation for affected individuals.
Lenders may still appeal the decision, and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is conducting its own investigation into these practices. Recognising the complexity of the investigation and the need for comprehensive data, the regulator extended the deadline for firms to respond to consumer complaints related to discretionary commission arrangements.
Initially set for September 2024, the deadline was moved to December 2025, allowing firms more time to provide final responses. This extension also grants consumers until July 2026, or 15 months from the date of their final response letter, to refer complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Impacts of the Court of Appeal Ruling
The immediate impact of the Court of Appeal ruling has been significant, with some lenders pausing their finance agreements or suspending commission payments while reassessing compliance. For instance, Close Brothers, Metro Bank, and Lloyds Banking Group have halted certain aspects of their operations to ensure that they align with the new regulatory expectations.
Financial analysts estimate that compensation costs could reach up to £23 billion, drawing comparisons to the notorious £50 billion Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) scandal.
This uncertainty has had repercussions in the stock market as well. Secure Trust Bank, for instance, issued a profit warning, highlighting that its annual profits would be significantly lower due to delays in loan recoveries within its vehicle finance division, compounded by the ongoing scrutiny from the FCA. This announcement led to a sharp decline in the bank’s share price, which fell by 13% on the day of the warning.
Meanwhile, consumer advocates, including Martin Lewis of MoneySavingExpert, have been vocal about the ruling’s implications. He has emphasised that this decision could not only transform car finance but could also have broader consequences for consumer lending across other sectors. The increased likelihood of consumer compensation, coupled with stricter regulatory standards, suggests a pivotal shift towards prioritising consumer rights over opaque financial practices.
Take Action Now
If you’ve been affected by these commission arrangements, now is the time to act. With compensation more likely than ever, it’s crucial to lodge your complaint as soon as possible to secure your place in the queue. Don’t miss this opportunity to hold lenders accountable—act now and take the first step towards the compensation you deserve.
Start your online check today.
